Inside the Bold Syria Feasibility Study Driving Renewal

Syria’s factories are trying to restart after years of shutdowns, but the country still cannot supply the power needed to support industrial operations. Pre-war electricity capacity was 9.5 GW, yet today, it stands at only 1.6 GW. It’s a fall to 17% of its former level. Even repaired plants can only produce around 5,000 MW, and fuel shortages restrict output further. Most areas receive less than four hours of grid power a day. Under these conditions, reopening factories is impossible without new energy sources. This is why the Syria Feasibility Study is a topic we are discussing in this article. Did you know that the first wave of real capital flowing into Syria, particularly from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, is being invested directly in energy infrastructure?

Syria Feasibility Study: Why Gulf Investors Are Targeting Power First

Saudi Arabia alone has committed $6.4 billion to stabilize Syria’s power supply and revive industrial production. ACWA Power, one of the region’s most active developers, signed agreements for the Syria Feasibility Study covering 1,000 MW of solar plants and 1,500 MW of wind projects, including grid-stabilization work.

The UAE is moving in the same direction. Its commitments include a 300 MW solar plant and part of a broader $7 billion package focused on rebuilding the power sector and adding 3,000 MW of renewables.

The Rise of Captive Power Plants

As the national grid struggles, Syria’s private sector is not waiting. Large factories are now developing their own solar and wind generation systems to guarantee operational continuity. These projects are known as Captive Power Plants.

Al-Badia Cement is one example. It is investing $200 million to upgrade its own power generation capacity to reach more than 5 million tonnes of annual output. In Aleppo’s industrial zone, developers are planning a 50-100 MW solar module plant to support hundreds of factories through on-site energy. These show that private industry no longer expects the state grid to recover fast enough. Businesses are choosing energy independence to protect their investments.

How the Syria Feasibility Study Has Changed

Foreign investors once viewed feasibility studies as tools for checking market demand or pricing potential. Today, the meaning has shifted.

A modern feasibility study about the country is now a technical document focused on one question: Can the project generate or secure its own power?

ACWA Power’s assessments illustrate this shift. Their studies examine existing power plants, propose upgrades, evaluate solar and wind mixes, and measure grid stability. The regional goal is to identify renewable systems that allow new factories to operate even when the state supply collapses. With Syria’s industrial baseline hovering around 1,500 MW, energy capacity must grow fivefold for the economy to restart.

Why Energy Independence Defines Investor Confidence

Whether it is Saudi Arabia’s 2.5 GW solar-wind joint development agreement or Qatar’s 5 GW gas-solar portfolio, every major investor is following the same strategy: power first, industry second.

This is because the main risk in entering Syria is not demand — factories, cement plants, and manufacturing zones already know their markets. The risk is power interruption. A feasibility study must therefore prove technical independence, not just commercial value.

Moving Forward With Expert Support

Energy is now the foundation of Syria’s industrial recovery. And the Syria Feasibility Study has become the primary tool for de-risking every major project. Investors who want stronger guidance on energy planning and industrial strategy can explore more services through Market Research Syria, a global firm supporting complex reconstruction and infrastructure transitions.